Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
22.73k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
24.59k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
11.44k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
25.03k (x2.21)
TOTAL
57.85k
83.79k (x1.45)
Multithread
i5-10400T
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
134.28k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
178.56k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
78.16k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
38.26k (x15.44)
TOTAL
307.18k
429.25k (x1.4)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4