Core i5-10400T vs Ryzen 5 3500X
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
373.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
15.48k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
22.91k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
7.1k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
21.11k (x1.87)
TOTAL
57.85k
66.61k (x1.15)
Multithread
i5-10400T
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
90.39k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
139.1k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
53.2k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
90.92k (x36.69)
TOTAL
307.18k
373.61k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
5748 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4