Core i5-10400T vs i7-1185G7
Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
230.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
24.35k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
20.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
8.61k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
7.84k (x0.69)
TOTAL
57.85k
60.87k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-10400T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
93.58k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
94.71k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
33.28k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
9.34k (x3.77)
TOTAL
307.18k
230.91k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-10400T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
8247 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4