Core i5-10400F vs Xeon E5-2667 v3
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
343.64k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
20.99k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
11.9k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.72k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
3.75k (x0.29)
TOTAL
68.14k
41.36k (x0.61)
Multithread
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
172.62k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
110.03k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
44.06k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
16.93k (x2.24)
TOTAL
369.97k
343.64k (x0.93)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
2545 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4