Core i5-10400F vs i7-930
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-930 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the i7-930 gets 42.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the i7-930 gets 42.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.3 times faster than the i7-930 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
106a5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2010
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
17.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
69.39k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
1.94k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
4.38k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
2.64k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
2.41k (x0.19)
TOTAL
38.72k
11.37k (x0.29)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
7.3k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
19.36k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
13.43k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
2.01k (x0.15)
TOTAL
137.82k
42.11k (x0.31)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
278 points/W
56 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1218 points/W
149 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
412 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
15 points/W
TOTAL
2120 points/W
324 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-930
Test#1 (Integers)
1000 points/GHz
633 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3852 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2933 points/GHz
785 points/GHz
TOTAL
9005 points/GHz
3708 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4