| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-860


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-860 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the i7-860 gets 49.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-860 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
106e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2009
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
19.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
75.43k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
2.15k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
4.87k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
2.82k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
3.13k (x0.25)
TOTAL
38.72k
12.97k (x0.33)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
8.24k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
21.63k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
14.65k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
5.02k (x0.36)
TOTAL
137.82k
49.54k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
278 points/W
87 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1218 points/W
228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
412 points/W
154 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
2120 points/W
521 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1000 points/GHz
620 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3852 points/GHz
1405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2933 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
9005 points/GHz
3741 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4