| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-9750H


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ed
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
4.53k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
18.24k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
5.76k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
13.01k (x1.03)
TOTAL
38.72k
41.54k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
24.3k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
97.88k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
29.85k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
11.93k (x0.86)
TOTAL
137.82k
163.95k (x1.19)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
25.22k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
21.97k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.02k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
10.71k (x0.83)
TOTAL
68.14k
62.92k (x0.92)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
125.56k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
115.86k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
25.63k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
9.4k (x1.24)
TOTAL
369.97k
276.46k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4