Core i5-10400F vs i7-4765T
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
134.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
15.61k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
8.8k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
3.58k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
3.33k (x0.26)
TOTAL
68.14k
31.31k (x0.46)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
66k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
43.27k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
17.39k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
7.88k (x1.04)
TOTAL
369.97k
134.53k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
3844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4