| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-4720HQ


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4720HQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-4720HQ gets 132.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.8 times faster than the i7-4720HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
47 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2015
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
40.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
132.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
3.79k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
9.64k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
4.34k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
3.76k (x0.3)
TOTAL
38.72k
21.53k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
11.66k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
37.71k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
16.38k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
5.94k (x0.43)
TOTAL
137.82k
71.69k (x0.52)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
20.68k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
10.28k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
4.87k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
4.29k (x0.33)
TOTAL
68.14k
40.12k (x0.59)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
66.84k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
42.85k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
16.77k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
5.88k (x0.78)
TOTAL
369.97k
132.35k (x0.36)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
1422 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
912 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
357 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
2816 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-4720HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
5745 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1352 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
11143 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4