| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
4.05k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
15.29k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
9.04k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
10.54k (x0.84)
TOTAL
38.72k
38.92k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
9.05k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
33.88k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
15.34k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
6.74k (x0.49)
TOTAL
137.82k
65.01k (x0.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
25.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
19.99k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
9.31k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
10.81k (x0.83)
TOTAL
68.14k
65.64k (x0.96)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
58.46k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
57.31k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
20.1k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
6.81k (x0.9)
TOTAL
369.97k
142.69k (x0.39)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4