Core i5-10400F vs i5-10300H
Description
Both models i5-10400F and i5-10300H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
27.14k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
24.75k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.73k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
11.84k (x0.91)
TOTAL
68.14k
69.47k (x1.02)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
105.77k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
107.47k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
24.82k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
8.02k (x1.06)
TOTAL
369.97k
246.07k (x0.67)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4