Core i5-10400F vs i3-10110U
Description
Both models i5-10400F and i3-10110U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
106.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
4.26k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
15.48k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
4.94k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
4.31k (x0.34)
TOTAL
38.72k
28.98k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
7.41k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
29.18k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
10.26k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
3.27k (x0.24)
TOTAL
137.82k
50.13k (x0.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
24.6k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
22.32k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.02k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
4.7k (x0.36)
TOTAL
68.14k
56.64k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
47.98k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
44.28k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
10.33k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
3.98k (x0.53)
TOTAL
369.97k
106.58k (x0.29)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4