Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 5900X gets 814.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.2 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a20f12
Core
Comet Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
April 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
83.5k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
814.74k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
22.6k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
24.85k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
11.25k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
24.8k (x1.91)
TOTAL
68.14k
83.5k (x1.23)
Multithread
i5-10400F
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
258.21k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
342.24k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
155.3k (x3.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
59k (x7.8)
TOTAL
369.97k
814.74k (x2.2)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
562 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
7759 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
4709 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5177 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
5167 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
17396 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4