Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4900HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
14.87k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
21.53k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
8.39k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
8.21k (x0.63)
TOTAL
68.14k
53k (x0.78)
Multithread
i5-10400F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
124.63k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
158.62k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
69.79k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
7.53k (x1)
TOTAL
369.97k
360.57k (x0.97)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4