Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 6800H
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 6800H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a40f41
Core
Comet Lake-S
Rembrandt
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
478.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
21.04k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
22.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
10.21k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
24.27k (x1.87)
TOTAL
68.14k
77.93k (x1.14)
Multithread
i5-10400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
158.65k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
215.86k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
89.45k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
14.77k (x1.95)
TOTAL
369.97k
478.73k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
10638 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4