Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
13.72k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
22.48k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.12k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
15.44k (x1.19)
TOTAL
68.14k
56.76k (x0.83)
Multithread
i5-10400F
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
110.92k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
200.56k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
54.24k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
7.01k (x0.93)
TOTAL
369.97k
372.73k (x1.01)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4