Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
15.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
22.82k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
8.63k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
7.17k (x0.55)
TOTAL
68.14k
54.11k (x0.79)
Multithread
i5-10400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
117.98k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
146.43k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
65.54k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
4.77k (x0.63)
TOTAL
369.97k
334.72k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4