Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.1 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
15.75k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.29k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
5.91k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
18.48k (x1.43)
TOTAL
68.14k
66.44k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-10400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
94.49k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
182.53k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
45.95k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
10.15k (x1.34)
TOTAL
369.97k
333.12k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4