Core i5-10400F vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 137.8 k points while the 1035T gets 58.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 2.4 times faster than the 1035T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
100fa0
Core
Comet Lake-S
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
80.19k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
1.98k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
4.57k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
2.57k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
3.51k (x0.28)
TOTAL
38.72k
12.64k (x0.33)
Multithread
i5-10400F
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
11.86k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
27.4k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
15.39k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
3.46k (x0.25)
TOTAL
137.82k
58.11k (x0.42)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
278 points/W
125 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1218 points/W
288 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
412 points/W
162 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
212 points/W
36 points/W
TOTAL
2120 points/W
612 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1000 points/GHz
639 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3852 points/GHz
1474 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1220 points/GHz
830 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2933 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
9005 points/GHz
4076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4