| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 370 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.14k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.97k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
4.57k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
17.21k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
9.97k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
14.98k (x1.19)
TOTAL
38.72k
46.75k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
12.75k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
45.98k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
27.86k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
20.06k (x1.45)
TOTAL
137.82k
106.66k (x0.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.28k
30.89k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
25.57k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
10.64k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.96k
15.66k (x1.21)
TOTAL
68.14k
82.77k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
163.67k
96.34k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
159.74k
95.75k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39k
32.29k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.56k
15.2k (x2.01)
TOTAL
369.97k
239.58k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2518 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2457 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
600 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
5692 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6112 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5438 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1283 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3014 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
15847 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4