Core i5-10400 vs i7-6900K
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-6900K is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i7-6900K gets 427.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6900K is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Broadwell-E
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
68.04k points
49.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.19k points
427.51k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
26.43k
23.11k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.89k
17.84k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
5.34k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
3.47k (x0.29)
TOTAL
68.04k
49.76k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-10400
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
163.14k
184.19k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
161.5k
181.2k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.94k
47.44k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.6k
14.69k (x1.93)
TOTAL
372.19k
427.51k (x1.15)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2510 points/W
1316 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
117 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
5726 points/W
3054 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i7-6900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6146 points/GHz
6247 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5555 points/GHz
4822 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
1444 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2814 points/GHz
938 points/GHz
TOTAL
15824 points/GHz
13450 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4