| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400 vs i5-10200H


Description
Both models i5-10400 and i5-10200H are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.04k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.19k points
260.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.43k
26.37k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.89k
23.91k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
5.57k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
11.68k (x0.96)
TOTAL
68.04k
67.53k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-10400

i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.14k
114.08k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
161.5k
114.71k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.94k
27.33k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.6k
4.25k (x0.56)
TOTAL
372.19k
260.38k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
2510 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
117 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5726 points/W
7439 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6146 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5555 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2814 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15824 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4