| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen 7 5800H


Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-S
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2020
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
68.04k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.19k points
426.9k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.43k
20.37k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.89k
22.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
10.18k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
21.49k (x1.78)
TOTAL
68.04k
74.56k (x1.1)

Multithread

i5-10400

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
163.14k
144.01k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
161.5k
191.86k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.94k
84.53k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.6k
6.5k (x0.85)
TOTAL
372.19k
426.9k (x1.15)

Performance/W
i5-10400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2510 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
117 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5726 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6146 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5555 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2814 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15824 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4