Core i5-10400 vs i3-12100T
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0655
90675
Core
Comet Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
68.04k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.19k points
330.62k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.43k
43.24k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.89k
23.76k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
12.67k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
13.88k (x1.15)
TOTAL
68.04k
93.54k (x1.37)
Multithread
i5-10400
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
163.14k
150.28k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
161.5k
126.29k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.94k
45.32k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.6k
8.73k (x1.15)
TOTAL
372.19k
330.62k (x0.89)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2510 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
117 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
5726 points/W
9446 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6146 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5555 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2814 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
15824 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4