| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400 vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 372.2 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 262.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.04k points
69.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.19k points
262.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.43k
26.46k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.89k
23.63k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.63k
10.24k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.1k
9.05k (x0.75)
TOTAL
68.04k
69.38k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-10400

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
163.14k
105.02k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
161.5k
108.51k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.94k
36.5k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.6k
12.04k (x1.58)
TOTAL
372.19k
262.07k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2510 points/W
3751 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
3875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
615 points/W
1304 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
117 points/W
430 points/W
TOTAL
5726 points/W
9359 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6146 points/GHz
6299 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5555 points/GHz
5626 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1309 points/GHz
2439 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2814 points/GHz
2154 points/GHz
TOTAL
15824 points/GHz
16518 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4