Core i5-10400 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
18.62k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
10.49k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
4.04k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
3.26k (x0.27)
TOTAL
69.31k
36.41k (x0.53)
Multithread
i5-10400
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
236.25k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
151.05k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
58.9k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
6.7k (x1.13)
TOTAL
367.65k
452.9k (x1.23)
Performance/W
i5-10400
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4