Core i5-10400 vs i7-8086K
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1 times faster than the i7-8086K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-S
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
352.4k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
28.74k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
25.31k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
5.78k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
13.12k (x1.1)
TOTAL
69.31k
72.95k (x1.05)
Multithread
i5-10400
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
160.53k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
147.29k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
35.65k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
8.92k (x1.5)
TOTAL
367.65k
352.4k (x0.96)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
3709 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4