Core i5-10400 vs i5-10200H
Description
Both models i5-10400 and i5-10200H are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
a0652
Core
Comet Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
26.37k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
23.91k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
5.57k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
11.68k (x0.98)
TOTAL
69.31k
67.53k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
114.08k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
114.71k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
27.33k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
4.25k (x0.71)
TOTAL
367.65k
260.38k (x0.71)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4