Core i5-10400 vs Ryzen 7 1800X
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 1800X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2020
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
410.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
15.02k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
24.26k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
5.53k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
16.26k (x1.36)
TOTAL
69.31k
61.07k (x0.88)
Multithread
i5-10400
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
122.92k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
220.32k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
59.78k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
7.44k (x1.25)
TOTAL
367.65k
410.47k (x1.12)
Performance/W
i5-10400
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
4321 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4