Core i5-10400 vs i5-11300H
Description
The i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400 gets a score of 367.7 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
69.31k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
367.65k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
27.46k
25.83k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.28k
23.56k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.65k
9.2k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.92k
5.06k (x0.42)
TOTAL
69.31k
63.64k (x0.92)
Multithread
i5-10400
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
165.5k
116.87k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
156.32k
121.08k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.88k
41.8k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.96k
6k (x1.01)
TOTAL
367.65k
285.75k (x0.78)
Performance/W
i5-10400
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2546 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2405 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
614 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
5656 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6386 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5647 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1314 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2772 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
16118 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4