Core i5-1038NG7 vs i7-4790
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-4790 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i7-4790 gets 173.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4790 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
306c3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2020
May 2014
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
44.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
173.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
22.19k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
12.45k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
5.11k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
4.98k (x0.43)
TOTAL
65.35k
44.73k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
87.14k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
58k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
22.75k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
6k (x0.64)
TOTAL
243.18k
173.89k (x0.72)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
1037 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
691 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
2070 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i7-4790
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
5547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1279 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
11183 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4