| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs i5-8265U


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.7 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
28 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
143.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
19.19k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
17.47k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.04k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
5.97k (x0.52)
TOTAL
65.35k
46.67k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
64.43k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
61.91k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
13.36k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
3.52k (x0.38)
TOTAL
243.18k
143.23k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4