Core i5-1038NG7 vs i3-6100
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 2.2 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
506e3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
28 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
22.89k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
21.04k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.9k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
4.01k (x0.35)
TOTAL
65.35k
52.84k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
50.05k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
47.13k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
11.38k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
3.72k (x0.4)
TOTAL
243.18k
112.28k (x0.46)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4