| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs Ryzen 7 4800HS


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1.8 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
860f01
Core
Ice Lake-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
May 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
427.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
16.66k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
26.01k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
9.31k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
9.15k (x0.79)
TOTAL
65.35k
61.12k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
144.48k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
192.46k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
83.17k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
7.51k (x0.8)
TOTAL
243.18k
427.61k (x1.76)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
12218 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4