Core i5-1038NG7 vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 2.1 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
870f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
28 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
May 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
17.57k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
27.38k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
9.35k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
23.9k (x2.07)
TOTAL
65.35k
78.2k (x1.2)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
176.08k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
219.88k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
100k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
12.93k (x1.39)
TOTAL
243.18k
508.89k (x2.09)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4