| | | | | | |

Core i5-1038NG7 vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
800f82
Core
Ice Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
292.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
13.83k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
23.16k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
5.15k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
15.18k (x1.32)
TOTAL
65.35k
57.33k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-1038NG7

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
83.44k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
161.53k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
40.62k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
6.72k (x0.72)
TOTAL
243.18k
292.31k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4