| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon W3530


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
106a5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Bloomfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
72.77k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
7.51k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
4.93k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
3.02k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.74k (x0.48)
TOTAL
28.56k
18.2k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
31.33k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
23.11k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
15.78k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.55k (x0.37)
TOTAL
87.45k
72.77k (x0.83)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
560 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4