Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon W3520
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the W3520 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the W3520 gets 73.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.2 times faster than the W3520 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
106a5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Nehalem-WS
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
17.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
73.16k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
7.35k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
4.89k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.9k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.82k (x0.5)
TOTAL
28.56k
17.96k (x0.63)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
29.69k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
22.26k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
14.91k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
6.29k (x0.91)
TOTAL
87.45k
73.16k (x0.84)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
228 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
115 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
563 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
W3520
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
960 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
6123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4