| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5472


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5472 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the E5472 gets 48.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.8 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
10676
Core
Ice Lake-U
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA-771
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
kB
Date
August 2019
November 2007
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
16.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
48.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
2.29k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
5.85k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
2.44k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
4.81k (x0.46)
TOTAL
38.92k
15.39k (x0.4)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
9.06k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
23.09k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
9.7k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
2.53k (x0.38)
TOTAL
65.01k
44.38k (x0.68)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
2.88k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
6.36k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.55k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
4.83k (x0.85)
TOTAL
28.56k
16.62k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
11.19k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
24.85k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
10.04k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.54k (x0.37)
TOTAL
87.45k
48.62k (x0.56)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
311 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
125 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
32 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
608 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E5472
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
961 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
2119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1610 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
5539 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4