Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 143.9 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
206d7
Core
Ice Lake-U
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
8.76k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
7.35k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
3.86k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
3.32k (x0.31)
TOTAL
54.03k
23.28k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
78.51k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
66.46k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
36.42k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
3.88k (x0.58)
TOTAL
143.94k
185.26k (x1.29)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3694 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3934 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
9596 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3757 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5440 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2543 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2862 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
14601 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4