| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
306c3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
3.45k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
9.96k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
4.26k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
4.27k (x0.41)
TOTAL
38.92k
21.94k (x0.56)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
14.01k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
37.68k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
17.05k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
7.35k (x1.09)
TOTAL
65.01k
76.09k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
19.17k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
10.55k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
4.79k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
4.65k (x0.43)
TOTAL
65.64k
39.16k (x0.6)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
73.13k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
42.06k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
18.03k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
7.54k (x1.11)
TOTAL
142.69k
140.76k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4