| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Pentium G4560


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the G4560 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the G4560 gets 89.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G4560 is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906e9
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
44.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
89.91k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
13.01k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
18.74k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.06k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
7.4k (x1.31)
TOTAL
28.56k
44.21k (x1.55)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
27.22k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
43.79k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
11.74k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
7.16k (x1.03)
TOTAL
87.45k
89.91k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
811 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
133 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
1665 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
G4560
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
2114 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
12632 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4