| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs Pentium 4417U


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 4417U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the 4417U gets 41.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.1 times faster than the 4417U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
806ea
Core
Ice Lake-U
Kaby Lake-R
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2048 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
24.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
41.15k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
7.94k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
11.35k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.39k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.8k (x0.49)
TOTAL
28.56k
24.49k (x0.86)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
13.1k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
21.1k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
4.49k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.46k (x0.36)
TOTAL
87.45k
41.15k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
873 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
1407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
299 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
2743 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
4417U
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
3452 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
4937 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
1217 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
10646 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4