| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i9-9900K


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i9-9900K gets 545.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 3.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ec
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
86.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
545.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
5.17k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
21.15k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
7.01k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
15.32k (x1.45)
TOTAL
38.92k
48.66k (x1.25)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
38.45k (x4.25)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
155.68k (x4.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
51k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
18.26k (x2.71)
TOTAL
65.01k
263.38k (x4.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
33.62k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
30.02k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
7.17k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
15.43k (x1.43)
TOTAL
65.64k
86.24k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
248.93k (x4.26)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
224.43k (x3.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
53.39k (x2.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
18.54k (x2.72)
TOTAL
142.69k
545.3k (x3.82)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2620 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2362 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
195 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5740 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6724 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
6003 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
3087 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
17247 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4