| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i9-7980XE


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-7980XE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i9-7980XE gets 1223.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 8.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
50654
Core
Ice Lake-U
Skylake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
August 2019
May 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
76.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
1223.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.89k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
19.98k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
6.14k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
9.81k (x0.93)
TOTAL
38.92k
40.82k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
79.8k (x8.82)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
372.72k (x11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
121.42k (x7.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
26.48k (x3.93)
TOTAL
65.01k
600.43k (x9.24)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
31.16k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
28.13k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
6.65k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
10.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
65.64k
76.43k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
560.19k (x9.58)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
516.97k (x9.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
123.94k (x6.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
22.69k (x3.33)
TOTAL
142.69k
1223.79k (x8.58)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
751 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
137 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
7417 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
7081 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1512 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
17371 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4