Core i5-1035G4 vs i9-10980XE
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 8.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 8.7 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
50657
Core
Ice Lake-U
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
25344 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.52k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
17.94k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.5k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
9.64k (x0.91)
TOTAL
38.92k
37.6k (x0.97)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
84.93k (x9.38)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
409.55k (x12.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
122.88k (x8.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
22.12k (x3.28)
TOTAL
65.01k
639.48k (x9.84)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
16.03k (x2.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
23.95k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
6.03k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
9.37k (x1.65)
TOTAL
28.56k
55.38k (x1.94)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
316.11k (x12.51)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
503.75k (x13.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
131.82k (x7.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
22.24k (x3.22)
TOTAL
87.45k
973.92k (x11.14)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.9k
16.4k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
20.13k
20.97k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.41k
5.82k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.59k
8.86k (x0.84)
TOTAL
54.03k
52.05k (x0.96)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
55.4k
316.84k (x5.72)
Test#2 (FP)
59.01k
461.09k (x7.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.83k
129.82k (x5.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.7k
22.09k (x3.3)
TOTAL
143.94k
929.85k (x6.46)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
29.53k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
22.59k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.99k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
10.22k (x0.95)
TOTAL
65.64k
68.33k (x1.04)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
587.06k (x10.04)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
496.41k (x8.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
134.66k (x6.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
22.99k (x3.37)
TOTAL
142.69k
1241.12k (x8.7)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4