| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i9-10900K


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 4.8 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
19.5k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
28.01k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
7.45k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
15.82k (x2.79)
TOTAL
28.56k
70.79k (x2.48)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
194.49k (x7.69)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
312.59k (x8.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
89.14k (x5.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
12.58k (x1.82)
TOTAL
87.45k
608.81k (x6.96)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
32.67k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
28.49k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
6.53k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
12.72k (x1.18)
TOTAL
65.64k
80.41k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
307.39k (x5.26)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
298.47k (x5.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
72.94k (x3.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
6.85k (x1.01)
TOTAL
142.69k
685.65k (x4.81)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4