Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-640LM
Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-640LM is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the i7-640LM gets 31.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.8 times faster than the i7-640LM. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
20655
Core
Ice Lake-U
Calpella
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA1288
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
25 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
16.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
31.74k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
7.01k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
4.58k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.73k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.03k (x0.36)
TOTAL
28.56k
16.35k (x0.57)
Multithread
i5-1035G4
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
12.93k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
10.21k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
6.22k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
2.37k (x0.34)
TOTAL
87.45k
31.74k (x0.36)
Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
517 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
409 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
1269 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-640LM
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2627 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
762 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
6130 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4