| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-920


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 87.5 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 1.9 times faster than the i7-920 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
106a5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Bloomfield
Architecture
Ice Lake
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
47.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
1.97k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
4.43k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
2.75k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
2.53k (x0.24)
TOTAL
38.92k
11.68k (x0.3)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
7.71k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
18.81k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
13.76k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
5.07k (x0.75)
TOTAL
65.01k
45.34k (x0.7)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
6.12k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
4.76k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
2.78k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
2.67k (x0.47)
TOTAL
28.56k
16.33k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
19.26k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
14.96k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
8.05k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
4.92k (x0.71)
TOTAL
87.45k
47.2k (x0.54)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
1685 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2499 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1185 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
461 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
5830 points/W
363 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
1910 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2852 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1424 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1531 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
7718 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4