| | | | | | |

Core i5-1035G4 vs i7-9850H


Description
The i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1035G4 gets a score of 142.7 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906ed
Core
Ice Lake-U
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.64k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
142.69k points
289.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.05k
4.11k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.29k
15.19k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.04k
5.04k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.54k
11.98k (x1.14)
TOTAL
38.92k
36.32k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
9.05k
22.68k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
33.88k
83.77k (x2.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.34k
30.37k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.74k
8.55k (x1.27)
TOTAL
65.01k
145.37k (x2.24)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
7.07k
14.5k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
20.73k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.27k
5.31k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.66k
11.09k (x1.96)
TOTAL
28.56k
51.62k (x1.81)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.28k
77.18k (x3.05)
Test#2 (FP)
37.48k
126.35k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.77k
33.63k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.92k
7.87k (x1.14)
TOTAL
87.45k
245.03k (x2.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1035G4
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
19.83k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
19.99k
16.52k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
3.87k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.81k
9.02k (x0.83)
TOTAL
65.64k
49.24k (x0.75)

Multithread

i5-1035G4

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.46k
130.19k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
57.31k
121.44k (x2.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
28.05k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.81k
9.62k (x1.41)
TOTAL
142.69k
289.3k (x2.03)

Performance/W
i5-1035G4
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3897 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3821 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1340 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
454 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
9513 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-1035G4
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
6901 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5401 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2515 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2922 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
17739 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4